Our editorial policy is built around reader value, technical clarity and transparent limits. Critical-power information can influence expensive or safety-relevant decisions, so confidence should come from evidence and careful scope rather than invented authority.
Sources
For standards, safety requirements and public-sector guidance, we prefer primary sources such as IEC, BSI, NHS England and the UK Health and Safety Executive. Manufacturer material may be used for product-specific concepts, but promotional claims should not be presented as universal facts. Secondary industry sources can provide useful context when clearly distinguished from formal requirements.
Accuracy and uncertainty
Articles should state assumptions and avoid unsupported precision. Runtime, efficiency, battery life and availability depend on conditions; therefore, the site avoids universal values where engineering context is required. Examples should be labelled as hypothetical. Business-specific claims, awards, certifications, customer numbers and testimonials are not invented.
Editorial independence
Advertising, if introduced, should be visually distinct from editorial material. Advertisers do not purchase favourable technical conclusions. Sponsored material should be labelled. Affiliate links, if ever used, should be disclosed at the point where commercial influence could reasonably matter.
Use of AI-assisted tools
Digital tools may assist research organisation, drafting, code production or quality checks. The publication standard remains the same: content should be reviewed for factual plausibility, duplication, unsupported claims, readability, internal consistency and source quality. AI-assisted production is not a reason to publish thin or repetitive material.
Updates
Articles that depend on standards or official guidance should be reviewed when a material revision becomes known. Update dates should reflect substantive review, not cosmetic changes. Where a correction changes the meaning of a technical recommendation, the correction should be documented.
Conflicts and commercial relationships
If the live operator develops supplier relationships, those relationships should be disclosed where relevant. Technical coverage should not imply that a product was tested unless an actual documented test occurred. Absence of a supplier from the site should not be interpreted as a negative assessment.